Our approach

How independent verification is carried out

RAYID applies a consistent, mixed-method verification approach combining technology, field verification, and independent oversight.

The verification journey

Six connected methods, one traceable chain of evidence

  1. Metadata verification

    Checking GPS, timestamps, background recording and device data against collected data.

  2. Random callback interviews

    Re-contacting a random sample of respondents or beneficiaries to confirm reported information.

  3. Spot checks and back-checks

    Direct observation of data collection and field-visit using structured checklists to confirm data collection actually occurred as planned.

  4. Audio recording and transcript cross-checking

    Cross-reference recorded interviews against submitted data to detect fabrication or misreporting.

  5. Data consistency analysis

    Statistical and logical checks for outliers, duplication, and internal inconsistency in datasets.

  6. Context and community verification

    Validation exercises with community members or leaders to confirm data accuracy.

Evidence sources

What we examine to reach an independent judgement

Every finding is traced back to a named source of evidence, not an impression.
01

Primary field evidence

Direct observation and live verification using checklists.

02

Respondent-verified evidence

Random callback interviews and community validation exercises.

03

Metadata evidence

GPS, timestamps, device data, survey duration logs.

04

Audio/transcript evidence

Recordings cross-checked against submitted data.

05

Document evidence

Document review, beneficiary lists, agendas and other relevant documents.

Quality alert protocol

Where our verification identifies material quality concerns, RAYID provides immediate, evidence-based feedback and recommends corrective actions. If critical quality failures exceed an agreed threshold — for example, 10% of verified interviews — RAYID issues a formal quality alert to the commissioning client.

Field discipline

Better decisions begin with reliable evidence

We believe that better decisions begin with reliable evidence. Our commitment is to ensure that organizations can rely on the quality of the information guiding their programmes, policies, and investments. Through independent quality assurance and rigorous verification, we help our clients reduce risk, strengthen accountability, and deliver meaningful, measurable impact for the communities they serve.

Reported figures and charts under independent review

Our origin

From experience to innovation

Our Founder and Managing Director spent years leading large-scale data collection and overseeing quality assurance, where he witnessed recurring quality issues, including non-compliance with protocols, poorly conducted interviews, and inaccurate reporting. These experiences demonstrated how weaknesses in the quality of evidence can ultimately influence decisions affecting people's lives.

These experiences ultimately inspired the creation of RAYID, an independent quality assurance firm dedicated exclusively to verifying the quality of humanitarian evidence.

We recognized that many organizations invest heavily in data collection but comparatively little in independently verifying whether the data can actually be trusted. Research firms are often responsible for both collecting data and assessing its quality, creating an inherent risk that quality concerns may be overlooked, corrected quietly, or underreported in order to protect organizational reputation or project timelines.

RAYID was established to provide an independent layer of quality assurance. We do not collect programme data or implement projects. Instead, we verify whether the evidence generated by others meets agreed quality standards through systematic review of field processes, metadata, audio recordings (where consented), respondent verification, spot checks, back checks and independent quality assessments.

Our objective is simple: to ensure that decisions affecting lives are informed by reliable evidence rather than assumptions, shortcuts, or fabricated data.

Insight. Quality. Impact.

Independent assurance for evidence that carries weight

Tell us what needs to be verified and we will scope the checks, the standard, and the reporting with you.